随着研究条件的提高、学术眼界的拓宽,今天的美术史研究者对于资料信息的获取更为便捷。他们在推进研究不断深入的同时,也从以往的美术作品、艺术现象中发现“新”问题。质疑与修正本属正常,但也曾导致一些草率的翻案文章出现,至于对作品的真伪考辨更应谨慎严肃。对史学研究而言,求证辨析的方式与过程比真伪结果更有价值。本期张烨的文章即属此类,该文从考古地图、版画作品、文献著录、作品题跋等各类史料中寻找蛛丝马迹,小心求证,值得关注。 With the improvement of research conditions and widening of academic horizon, today’s art history researchers are more convenient for obtaining information and information. While pushing forward the deepening of their research, they also found the issue of “new ” from the previous works of art and arts. It is normal for questions and amendments to be made, but some sloppy rehearsal articles have also appeared. As for the authenticity of the works, more careful and serious questions should be taken. For historiography, the way and process of verification and identification are more valuable than the authenticity and falsehood results. The article in this issue of Zhang Ye belongs to this category. This article looks for clues from various historical materials such as archeological maps, prints, bibliographies, and inscriptions on works. Careful confirmation is worth noting.