《韩非子·内储说上》篇有三条标称“孔子言”的论法文献,其真实性和可信度长期以来存在争议。凭借现存相关文献,无论直接证其真还是证其伪,都缺乏具有说服力的论据,因而使研究陷入僵局。采取间接论证法,从孔子的法思想、权变思想、《韩非子》引用文献的特点,以及孔子言论的流传过程四个方面入手,对这三条论法文献进行考辨,则可把研究引向深入。 There are three nominal “Confucian language” articles on the subject of “Han Feizi · Succussion”, which have long been controversial in their authenticity and credibility. With the existing literature, there is a lack of convincing arguments, either directly or indirectly, that has stalled the study. Taking the indirect argumentation method, starting from the four aspects of the thought of Confucianism, contingent thinking, the characteristics of the quoted literature of “Han Feizi” and the circulating process of Confucius’s speech, .