论文部分内容阅读
国内外有关专家从海气间相互作用对厄尼诺事件进行了有益的探讨。认为与厄尼诺有关联的秘鲁海岸外的海面温度上升,是由于东南信风减弱而引起的冷水上翻的减弱(Bjerknes,1966;Wooster和Guillen,1974)。然而,E.M.Rasmusson等指出,日界线以东(140—170°w)沿着赤道,风距平出现的东西减弱不是在厄瓜多尔—秘鲁沿岸海温正距平之前,而是在它之后。C.S.Ramage等通过统计,在单侧检验15%的水平上没有拒绝海面温度与风速无关的零假设。认为人们必须抛弃厄尼诺时期秘鲁海面的风异常弱的想法。
Experts at home and abroad made a useful discussion on the EINO event from the interaction between the sea and air. The rise in sea surface temperature outside of the Peruvian coast associated with the EINENO is due to the weakening of the cold water dip due to the weakening of the south-easterly trust (Bjerknes, 1966; Wooster and Guillen, 1974). However, E.M. Rasmusson et al. Pointed out that the easterly wind anomalies that occurred along the equator to the east (140-170 ° w) to the coastline of the D line were not before, but just behind, the SSTA over the coast of Ecuador - Peru. According to statistics by C.S. Ramage et al., There is no rejection of the null hypothesis that the sea surface temperature is independent of the wind speed at the unilateral test level of 15%. Think that people must abandon the idea of weak winds on the Peruvian Sea during the Ernino period.