论文部分内容阅读
传统观点认为：在１８８３—１８８５年的中法战争中，中国取得镇南关大捷，却未能乘胜攻击，反而签订了屈辱的《中法天津条约》，是谓中国不败而败，法国不胜而胜。本文认为镇南关大捷尽管政治影响很大．但在军事上，它只是中法战争陆路战场上的一次局部胜利。从更重要的海路战场或者是从战争全局来看，清政府始终处于劣势。况且当时清政府所处的国际环境不允许它继续再战，它的中央和地方财政也无力支持再战。另一方面．法国虽因镇南关之战而倒阁．但其元气未伤，正增兵增饷准备再战。因此，趁镇南关获胜的良机，“乘胜即收”，利用列强间的利益冲突，尽可能体面地签订中法和约，确是清政府从大局着想的明智之举、也是处于列强瓜分下的弱国，在夹缝中求生存“以夷制夷”政策的成功运用。
The traditional view is that during the Sino-French War of 1883-1885, when China achieved the victory of Zhennan Pass but failed to win the victory, it signed the humiliating Sino-French Treaty of Tianjin, saying that China was defeated and defeated. France, Victory This paper argues that the great victory of Zhennan Guanzheng despite the great political influence. However, in the military, it is only a partial victory on the land battlefield of the Sino-French War. From the more important maritime battlefield or from the overall situation of the war, the Qing government has always been at a disadvantage. Moreover, at that time, the international environment in which the Qing government was located did not allow it to continue its battles, and its central and local governments were unable to support the rematch. on the other hand. Although France due to Zhennan off the battle and cabinet. However, its strength is not hurt, is reprovisioning the pay rates to fight again. Therefore, it is indeed a wise move of the Qing government to think in the interests of the overall situation while taking advantage of the chances of winning the victory of Nanguan and taking advantage of the conflicts of interest between the powers and signing the Sino-French peace treaty as far as possible. It is also under the influence of the powers Weak States, in the cracks in seeking survival “to control the barbarians,” the successful application of the policy.