论文部分内容阅读
3月,有一个叫四川阆中的地方,火了。火,不因为物产多么丰饶,也不因为经济发展多么强劲,而因为一出让人瞠目结舌的公审——3月16日,四川阆中市人民法院在阆中市江南镇公开宣判一起妨害公务案,8名被告人分别被判处6—8个月不等有期徒刑,其中两名宣告缓刑。舆论为之哗然。众议的焦点,在于为何要进行公审。1988年,国家最高法、最高检和公安就已发布《关于坚决制止将已决犯、未决犯游街示众的通
In March, there was a place in Langzhong, Sichuan, where it was fire. Fire, not because of the abundance of property, nor because of how strong economic development, but because of a surprising public trial - March 16, Sichuan Huangzhong City People’s Court in Langzhong City Gangnan town publicly interfered with obstruction of official business, 8 The defendants were sentenced to imprisonment ranging from 6 to 8 months, of which two sentenced to probation. Uproar in public opinion. The focus of the congress is on why the public trial should be conducted. In 1988, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the public security authorities of the country issued the "Resolution on Resolutely Suppressing the Seizure