论文部分内容阅读
20世纪“转形”问题论争是马克思经济学在西方经济理论界命运多舛的最为贴近的写照。20世纪初,“转形”问题论争主要限于马克思主义经济学研究“学术”圈内,以“补充”马克思经济学既有理论为基本出发点。60年代初以后,参与论争的学者的数量及其多样性以及所考察理论问题的广泛性,使得这次论争成为经济理论历史上最为显著而漫长的论争之一。80年代中期以来,“转形”问题进一步演变为新古典主义、新李嘉图主义和新马克思主义学派之间“三足鼎立”的论争态势。“转形”问题在西方经济学界论争的时落时起,与马克思经济学自身的“隐没”和“复兴”有直接关系;“转形”问题以各种方式的解决和再解决,以及各种经济思想流派之间的交锋和再交锋,体现了马克思经济学在西方经济学界曲折发展的世纪历程。
The 20th century “transformation ” debate is the closest portrayal of the fate of Marxist economics in western economic theorists. At the beginning of the 20th century, the controversy over the “transformation” problem was mainly confined to the “academic” circle of Marxist economics and the basic theory of “supplementary” Marxist economics. After the early 1960s, the number of scholars participating in the debate and their diversity as well as the extensiveness of the theoretical issues examined make this debate one of the most significant and long debates in the history of economic theory. Since the mid-1980s, the issue of “transformation” has further evolved into a polemic of “tripartite confrontation” between neoclassicalism, Neo-Ricardianism and the neo-Marxist school. The problem of “transformation” is directly related to the “hidden” and “revival” of Marxist economics in the debate of the western economic circles. The problems of “transformation” are solved in various ways And the confrontation and re-confrontation among the various schools of thought in economy and thought, which embodies the century course of Marxist economics in the tortuous development of western economics.