论文部分内容阅读
刘善经《四声指归》、《梁书.钟嵘传》、《南史》、《钟嵘传》和《丘迟传》所录钟嵘《诗品》资料与宋元以后刊行的《诗品》相比,有其无可比拟的文献价值,尤其是《梁书.钟嵘传》所录为完整的一篇《诗品序》,研究价值尤高。然而在实际的《诗品》研究中,往往存在用后来版本的文字判定隋、唐初人所录为讹误的颠倒是非的情况。这应引起人们对隋、唐初人所录《诗品》资料的足够重视,希望能够在更加接近《诗品》原来文献面目的基础上进一步提高对这一中国古代诗歌批评名著的研究水平。
The Book of Songs by Zhong-Jing Liu, The Book of Songs by Zhong Shan, The Book of Songs by Liang Shou, Zhong Rong Chuan, Nan Shi, Zhong Rong Chuan and Qiu Chi Chuan There is an incomparable literary value compared with “goods”, especially “Liang Shu. Zhong Rong Chuan” recorded as a complete “poetry order”, the research value is particularly high. However, in the actual study of “poems and articles”, there often exists the situation that the later version of the text is used to judge whether the sui or the early Tang dynasty were wrong or not. This should arouse enough attention to the data of “poetry and prose” recorded by Sui and Tang dynasties, hoping to further improve the research level of this ancient Chinese poetry criticism on the basis of getting closer to the original literature of “poetry.”