论文部分内容阅读
现代俄罗斯法在法律类型上属于大陆法系中罗马-日耳曼法族之德国法分支,结构严谨、逻辑严密、包罗万象的成文法典是立法者追求的终极目标,知识产权立法也不例外,将知识产权法纳入民法典中统一规定是俄罗斯民事立法的传统。本文拟通过对俄罗斯知识产权立法法典化的历史进程和立法背景的考察,以及对俄罗斯“四种方案”与中国“四种模式”的比较分析,试图揭示俄罗斯知识产权立法与民法典编纂之间的内在联系和俄罗斯知识产权“入典”的外在动因,从而为我国知识产权立法模式的选择和民法典编纂提供有益的借鉴。
The modern Russian Law belongs to the legal branch of the German law of the Roman-Germanic family in the civil law system. The rigorous and rigorous logic and all-encompassing written code are the ultimate goals pursued by legislators. Intellectual property legislation is no exception. Intellectual property The incorporation of Faulharun into the civil code is a tradition of Russian civil legislation. This article intends to reveal Russia’s intellectual property legislation and civil law through the comparative analysis of the historical process and legislative background of Russian legislation on legalization of intellectual property as well as the comparative analysis of the “Four Schemes” of Russia and China’s “Four Models” The internal connection between the codification and the external motivation of the Russian intellectual property rights into the “Code”, so as to provide useful reference for China’s choice of intellectual property legislative model and the compilation of civil code.