论文部分内容阅读
编者的话:“开心网”(kaixin001.com)和“开心网”(kaixin.com),哪个是“正宗”的?相信这个问题能够难倒相当多的网民。为此,这两个网站的开通者——北京开心人信息技术有限公司(以下简称开心人公司)和北京千橡互联科技发展有限公司(以下简称千橡互联公司)整整打了18个月的官司。2010年10月26日上午,众人瞩目的一审判决终于使这个“互联网不正当竞争第一案”暂告一段落。审理此案的北京市第二中级人民法院出于怎样的考量最终判决千橡互联公司构成了不正当竞争?长达一年半的审理过程中,又有哪些鲜为人知的故事?审理本案的周晓冰庭长为读者进行了全方位的解读——
Editor’s Note: “happy network ” (kaixin001.com) and “happy network ” (kaixin.com), which is “authentic ”? I believe this problem can stumped a considerable number of Internet users. To this end, the opening of these two sites - Beijing happy person Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to happy people) and Beijing Oaks Internet Technology Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Oaks Internet company) hit a full 18 months lawsuit. On the morning of October 26, 2010, the verdict of the first instance that everyone watched attracted the end of this “first case of unfair competition on the Internet”. The Second Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing that handled the case, for what consideration, finally decided that Qian’er Internet Corporation constituted unfair competition? What little known story happened during the one and a half year trial? President Zhou Xiaobao conducted a comprehensive interpretation of the reader -