论文部分内容阅读
一个技术条件较好的测量班上半年只抓技术,忽视政治,沒取得好成果;下半年把政治工作放在首位,取得了优異成績。問题在于: 去年測量四队一班出工后,先作的是某庫区的五等三角测量和調繪工作。完工后驗收时,成果质量大部分为剛剛合格的“可”級,少部分只达到了“良”級。論条件,全班人員是老技术員、老工人多,有技术,有經驗。为什么不能达到“优”級呢?照他們当初的說法是主要由于該地区地形复杂等客观因素造成的。随后,該班又接受了长山头三等水准測量任务,这个地区的条件好多了,可是,取得的成果貭量还大部份是“可”級!
A measurement class with better technical conditions only focused on technology in the first half of the year, neglected politics, and did not achieve good results. In the second half of the year, it gave top priority to political work and achieved excellent results. The problem lies in: After measuring the output of four teams and one class last year, the first thing to do was to perform the fifth-class triangulation and drawing work in a certain reservoir area. After the completion of acceptance, the quality of the results is mostly just “acceptable” and only a few have reached the “good” level. In terms of conditions, the entire class of personnel is old technicians, old workers, skilled and experienced. Why can’t we reach the “excellent” level? According to their original argument, it was mainly due to the objective factors such as the complex terrain in the area. Afterwards, the class accepted the third-class leveling task of Changshantou. The conditions in this area are much better. However, the amount of achievements obtained is still largely “possible”!