论文部分内容阅读
25年前,埃德蒙·西尔伯尼在涉及“社会主义者与犹太人间题”这一敏感课题时,指出:“我们不必从马克思对犹太人的论述中摘章寻句,就不仅能而且必须把他归类为直言不讳的反犹太主义者”。这一论断遭到了芒特·斯科普斯的理论抗争。斯科普斯在其论犹太人问题文章的第六部分“无例外则无规律:论耶路撒冷的犹太人”中,标举了与前者相反的例证。1977年,后者又在论述马克思女儿爱琳娜的专著中,披露了鲜为人知的例证(此例同样属于未明的编年史范围):马克思曾斥责维也纳反犹太人团体残虐犹太人的行径。据此,斯科普斯指出:我们可以从中透过马克思“率直的反犹太主义”外观而窥见其关怀犹太人的内在心声。西尔伯尼对斯科
Twenty-five years ago, Edmund Sierney, referring to the sensitive issue of “Socialism and Jewishness,” pointed out: “We do not have to pick the sentence from Marx’s account of the Jews, not only He must be classified as an outspoken anti-Semitic. ” This assertion has been hitched by the theory of Mount Skopje. In his sixth article on Jewish issues, “There is no law without exception: Jews in Jerusalem,” Cops quotes an example contradictory to the former. In 1977, the latter, in a monograph on the daughter of Emilian Marx, disclosed little-known examples (this example also belongs to the uncharted chronicle): Marx had denounced anti-Jewish behavior by anti-Semitic groups in Vienna. Accordingly, Skopje states: From here we can see through its appearance of Marx’s “straight-forward anti-Semitism” its inner voice of caring Jews. Sylbione vs. Scooby