新华社8月25日发自济南的消息:1980年《全国大学生“三好杯”排球赛结束,复旦大学男队和北京大学女队分获冠军》。全国各地大部分报纸和首都各报都于8月26日摘发。人民日报和光明日报分别在第四版、第三版上见报,并作了部分删节。从删节后的新闻看,使读者只知这次比赛的冠军和第三到第八名,而不知道与冠军厮杀的对手——亚军。读者不禁要问:亚军哪儿去了? 对照新华社电稿,发现两报都删掉了“昨天的男、女队冠军争夺战,是在北京大学队和复旦大学队之间展开的。……复旦大学女队获得亚军。……北京大学男队名列第二。”根据报纸版面编排的需要,新闻删节是必要的;问题在于:大笔一挥的时候,应该多为群众想想,多问自己几个问号——这样删,主要事实漏掉没有?群众能不能弄明白?从上面这则新闻为例,两家报纸删节得就不好,地位较重要的亚军失去了应有的位置,三至八名反而一一罗列了。这就忽视了事实本身的完整性,也没有很好地考虑读者们的兴趣和需要,让热心的读者们费解了。 Xinhua News Agency, August 25, from Ji’nan: In 1980, the “national college students” “Miyoshi Cup” volleyball game ended, Fudan University men’s team and Peking University women’s team won the championship. “ Most newspapers and capital capitals across the country were excerpts on August 26. People’s Daily and Guangming Daily reported in the fourth and third editions, respectively, and made some abridgement. From the news after the abolition, so that readers only know the championship and third to eighth place, and do not know the opponent with the title fight - runner-up. The reader can not help but ask: Where did the runner-up? Control Xinhua News Agency draft, found that the two newspapers have deleted the ”yesterday’s men’s and women’s team championship battle between Peking University team and Fudan University team.“ Fudan University women’s team won the runner-up ... ... Peking University men’s team ranked second. ”According to the needs of the newspaper layout, news deletion is necessary; The problem is: a stroke of the time, should be more for the masses to think more Ask yourself a few question marks - so deleted, the main fact missed? The masses can understand? From the above news, for example, the two newspapers cut bad, the status of the more important runner-up lost its place Three to eight are listed one by one. This ignores the integrity of the facts themselves, does not take into account the readers’ interests and needs well, so enthusiastic readers puzzled.