论文部分内容阅读
“发愤著书”传统在中国文学史中源远流长,该命题虽由司马迁《报任安书》中明确提出,但在之前与之后的历史中都有着明显的因袭脉络;“发愤著书”迥异于传统儒家“温柔敦厚”、“哀而不伤”的“中和”之美,而是反其道而行,空前强调真实的消极能量对文艺创作的巨大推动力;该命题正确揭示了创作心理中一个巨大而长期被掩盖的神秘空间,具有非凡的意义。
The tradition of “angry writing” goes back to ancient times in the history of Chinese literature. Although the proposition was explicitly stated in Sima Qian’s “An Appointment to the Book of Atsans,” there is an obvious line of contention in the history before and after; “” It is quite different from the beauty of “neutralization” in traditional Confucianism, “gentle and honest”, “sad and not sad”, but instead of emphasizing the great impetus of the negative energy of reality to literary and artistic creation in an unprecedented manner. This proposition correctly reveals a huge and long-term hidden mysterious space in creative psychology, which is of extraordinary significance.