中国古代法官在司法实践过程中固然存在着巨大的自由裁量的主观性空间,但这种主观性并非完全基于古代法官任意,而是在封建统治者乃至整个社会对于司法实践结果的价值期待的范围之内,依靠长时期伦理教育及社会实践经验能动行使的结果。但古代中国在缺乏法律至上及逻辑规则制约下的能动司法,必然存在着专擅的司法、腐败的司法的巨大可能性。 However, this subjectivity is not entirely based on the ancient judge’s discretion, but on the expectation of the feudal rulers and even the entire society as a result of judicial practice , Relying on long-term ethical education and social practice experience the results of the exercise. However, in ancient China, the lack of legal supremacy and the logic of rules and regulations under the active justice, there must be special magistrate, corrupt judiciary great possibility.