论文部分内容阅读
网络公共领域具有参与成本低廉,信息丰富而且容易搜寻,是一个自由、平等而利于审慎思辩的交流互动平台,提供了一个实践协商民主的机会。但是学界对于网络公共领域在广泛的参与、意见极化以及公开承担责任等方面可能造成的负面效果,仍然抱持疑虑。但通过对比分析从历史发展以来三种类型的公共空间可以看到,网络公共空间不是毫无缺点,但它所作为目前最具有发展特性和潜质的新兴媒体,某种意义上比传统的公共空间更加有机会完善自己,成为一个理想的民主协商公共空间。
With its low participation cost, abundant information and easy search, the online public domain is a free and fair platform conducive to cautious debate and exchange and provides an opportunity to practice consultative democracy. However, the academic circles still have doubts about the negative effects that the online public domain may have on such aspects as extensive participation, polarization of opinions, and public commitment. However, through comparative analysis of the three types of public space since the historical development, we can see that online public space is not without drawbacks. However, as an emerging medium with the most developmental characteristics and potential, it is in a sense more traditional than public space Have more opportunities to improve themselves and become an ideal public space for democratic consultation.