论文部分内容阅读
不断出现的文学理论之所以不能圆满地解释文学写作与文学批评的实践,而且彼此相互不容甚至冲突,其原因在于文学理论各自的视角不够全面、深刻,这尤其表现在后现代主义的文论范式上。历史唯物主义或唯物史观是一种超越具体文论之上的哲学,是一种基于社会历史发展的整体观,为我们提供了一个整体性视角;同时它也用经济基础、上层建筑等分层次的分析模式为我们提供了一个整体视角之下的层析方法。这种方法模式可以帮助我们对诸多文论范式进行哲学意义上的探析,进而对文学史上各种理论范式进行整体性理解,特别是从高层次上理解我国当前文论热衷于追随西方理论、失去自我主体性的现实困境,从而寻找到实现当代中国文论创新和突破的方法与路径。
The reason why the emerging theory of literature can not satisfactorily explain the practice of literary writing and literary criticism and can not tolerate or even conflict with each other is due to the fact that the respective perspectives of literary theory are not comprehensive and profound. This is especially manifested in the literary paradigm of postmodernism on. Historical materialism or historical materialism is a philosophy that transcends the specific literary theory and is a holistic view based on the development of social history, providing us with a holistic perspective. At the same time, it also uses the economic basis and the superstructure equal Hierarchical analysis provides us with a holistic approach to tomography. This method model can help us to philosophically analyze many literary paradigms and further understand the various theoretical paradigms in the history of literature. In particular, we understand from a high level that our current literary theory is keen to follow Western theories and lose Self-subjectivity in order to find ways and means to realize the innovation and breakthrough of contemporary Chinese literary theory.