通常,在进行不同国家住房体制研究时都会有一个大前提,即住房投资与经济发展密切相关。Donnison和Ungerson提出了一个论点,即不论其政体和意识形态如何,工业化社会的住房政策和市场是呈集聚方式的。实际上,住房产量不能完全按宏观经济特性以集聚方式加以解释,比如,住房自有化率与经济发展水平的相关关系并不强。Schmidt发现工业化国家的住房政策是“发散”的,这就要求人们关注每一个住房体制本身的特点与结构。Barlowt、Duncan的贡献在于建立了一个可靠的、有意义的分析框架,他提出了用福利资本主义不同社会制度概念去比较住房体制和生产。几种社会制度包括社会民主福利制度、自由 In general, there is a general premise when studying housing system in different countries. Housing investment is closely related to economic development. Donnison and Ungerson argue that the housing policy and the market in industrialized society are aggregated regardless of their regime and ideology. In fact, housing output can not be fully explained by macroeconomic characteristics in a cluster manner. For example, the correlation between the rate of housing self-occupation and the level of economic development is not strong. Schmidt finds that housing policies in industrialized countries are “divergent,” requiring people to pay attention to the characteristics and structure of each housing system itself. Barlowt, Duncan’s contribution lies in the establishment of a reliable and meaningful analytical framework. He proposed the concept of different social systems of welfare capitalism to compare housing systems and production. Several social systems include the social democratic welfare system and freedom