论文部分内容阅读
所有专利侵权判定都涉及对比。对于发明和实用新型专利,对比是在专利权利要求和被控侵权物之间进行的。对比要分别在专利权利要求、元特征和元要素三个层次上进行。利用专利侵权判定空间这一核心概念,通过元要素的元对比,才可能在元特征和权利要求的层面判定专利侵权是否成立并计算出侵权度,为侵权救济提供定性和定量的依据。本文提出的专利侵权判定元对比理论,可用于专利法相关规范的分析和案例研究,为专利侵权判定提供统一的分析框架和方法论。
All patent infringement decisions are involved in comparison. For inventions and utility model patents, the comparison is between the patent claim and the accused infringing thing. The comparison should be carried out on the three levels of patent claim, meta characteristics and elemental elements respectively. Using the core concept of patent infringement judgment space, it is possible to determine whether a patent infringement is established and calculate the infringement degree through the meta-comparison of the meta-elements so as to provide a qualitative and quantitative basis for the infringement remedy. The meta-analysis of the patent infringement judgment proposed in this paper can be used to analyze the relevant norms of patent law and case studies, and provide a unified analytical framework and methodology for the determination of patent infringement.