论文部分内容阅读
鉴于宏观调控与行政行为之间的本质区别,我们有必要在为公权力进行司法监督制度设计时,充分考虑宏观调控行为的特殊性。宏观调控行为的公权力性质、特点以及现有非司法监督的局限性,决定了对其进行司法监督的必要性。现阶段宏观调控司法监督的困境在于:司法机关介入宏观调控的角色错位、相关法律制度储备不足、相应的审判庭和违宪审查制度没有建立。因此,要走出宏观调控司法监督的困境,我们有必要通过司法体制改革提升司法地位的独立,设立宏观调控法庭和宪法法院以确保对宏观调控行为的合法性审查,淡化司法机关宏观调控执行者的角色,建立检察机关公益诉讼制度。
In view of the essential difference between macro-control and administrative behavior, it is necessary for us to fully consider the peculiarities of macro-control behavior when designing the judicial supervision system for public power. The nature and characteristics of public power and the limitations of existing non-judicial supervision of macro-control behavior determine the necessity of judicial supervision. At present, the predicament of judicially supervising and controlling the macro-control lies in the misplaced role of the judiciary in intervening in macroeconomic regulation and control, the insufficient reserve of the relevant legal system, and the corresponding courtrooms and constitutional review system not established. Therefore, to get out of the predicament of macro-control and judicial supervision, it is necessary for us to improve the independence of judicial status through the reform of the judicial system, set up macro-control courts and constitutional courts to ensure the legality of macro-control actions and to dilute the macro- Role, the establishment of prosecution public interest litigation system.