论文部分内容阅读
刑法目的论首要的问题是要回答刑法是否有目的?而刑法有无目的,涉及法律究竟有没有目的的问题。对此,法律盲进主义与后现代理论均从各自的进路提出了否定性的质疑。但前者否定的真意是认为法律不存在一个先验的、全能的康德意义上的目的,而后者的真意是提醒我们注意法律的权力异化。刑法(法律)的目的在社会需要的意义层面上是可以成立的。
The primary problem of the criminal law teleology is to answer whether the purpose of the criminal law? The criminal law has no purpose, involves the law whether there is no purpose of the problem. In this regard, both legal blindness and postmodernism put forward negative arguments from their respective approaches. However, the former negates the true idea that the law does not exist in a transcendental and almighty Kant’s sense of purpose, while the latter’s true intention is to remind us of the dissimilation of the power of law. The purpose of criminal law (law) can be established at the level of meaning of social needs.