论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析微创手术与传统手术对小儿疝气治疗效果的差异。方法:选取我院2013年1月-2017年6月收治的58例小儿疝气患儿进行试验研究,按照随机分配的方法将其分为两组。研究组实施微创手术,对照组实施传统手术。对比两组患儿的手术时间、术中出血量、术后的住院时间以及术后能自主活动的时间。结果:研究组患儿的手术各项相关指标显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在临床上微创手术与传统手术相比较,微创手术在治疗小儿疝气上更具有一定的价值意义,值得在临床上推广应用。
Objective: To analyze the difference between the minimally invasive surgery and traditional surgery in the treatment of infantile hernia. Methods: A total of 58 children with hernia admitted to our hospital from January 2013 to June 2017 were selected and randomly divided into two groups according to the random distribution method. The study group performed minimally invasive surgery and the control group performed conventional surgery. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative autonomic time were compared between the two groups. Results: The relevant indexes of operation in study group were significantly lower than those in control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional surgery, minimally invasive surgery is more valuable in the treatment of hernia in clinic, which is worth to be popularized clinically.