我手里有几部关于中学语文教学的专著。它们对于语文学科的特点各有自己的说法,有四性说(所谓“工具性、思想性、实践性、综合性”),有二性说(所谓“明显的工具性和鲜明的思想性”),有六性说(所谓“工具性,基础性、思想性、文学性、知识性、社会性”)。那么,以何说为对呢?我认为,都值得商榷。所谓特点,就是与众不同之处,如果彼此一样,还有什么特点可言呢?不论是四性,二性,还是六性,都是中学所有课程共同具有的,并非语文科所特有,因此,不能认为 I have several monographs on Chinese teaching in high school. They all have their own views on the characteristics of the Chinese subject. They have four-character theory (so-called “instrumental, ideological, practical, comprehensive”) and have two sexes (the so-called “obviously instrumental and distinctly thoughtful ”), There are six sexes (so-called “ instrumental, basic, ideological, literary, intellectual, social ”). So, what is right? I think it is debatable. The so-called characteristics are the differences. If they are the same as each other, what are the characteristics? Whether they are four, two or six sexes, all of which are common to all curriculums in secondary schools and are not unique to Chinese Can not think that