论文部分内容阅读
叶斯柏森和马泰修斯从不同角度对宾语进行了详细研究。叶斯柏森侧重于句法形式层面,他对宾语的定义以及对间接宾语和直接宾语的区分体现了这一特点。马泰修斯则侧重于宾语的功能。他从宾语和动词的语义联系界定宾语,并借助功能在句法层面的表现形式——格来划分宾语类别。两位学者对格的使用存在很大争议。他们的争议和研究给了我们一个启示:宾语研究应该确定不同的研究层面,形式和功能不可混淆,否则就会造成混乱。
Ye Si Bosen and Mathews Hughes from different perspectives on the object in detail. Ysbolson focuses on the syntactic level, which is reflected in his definition of objects and the distinction between indirect objects and direct objects. Matthias is focused on the function of the object. He defines the object from the semantic relationship between the object and the verb, and classifies the object category by the function of the grid in the syntactic level. The two scholars use the grid there is a big controversy. Their controversy and research give us an inspiration: object research should identify different research levels, forms and functions can not be confused, otherwise it will cause confusion.