论文部分内容阅读
国家侦查机关的任务在于追诉犯罪,不得逾越任务权限范围而去犯罪,更不得自相矛盾,为了追诉犯罪而去制造犯罪。而诱惑侦查这一极易被滥用而超越权限的侦查方式在实践中因其高效性而受到侦查机关的青睐,因此在庭审中有必要且必须对这一侦查方式是否超越权限范围通过证明来确定。这就需要根据判断诱惑侦查合法与否之判断标准来设置相关之证明责任以及证明标准。
The task of the state investigating organ is to prosecute crimes without going beyond the scope of the mandate and committing crimes. Nor should they contradict themselves and make crimes in order to prosecute crimes. The temptation to detect this easily abuse and beyond the authority of the detection method in practice because of its efficiency by the investigating authorities favor, it is necessary in the trial and must be on this investigation is beyond the scope of authority to determine the scope of the certificate . This requires setting the relevant burden of proof and the standard of proof on the basis of the criteria for judging the legitimacy of temptation detection.