课本对“吾社之行为士先者”中的“社”,特别在括号中说明“指应社”,而通览全篇,仅在题注中说,张溥和同乡张采等组织“复社”,丝毫未见有关“应社”的有关解说。这就令人费解了:“应社”是何时成立的何组织,它与“复社”是何关系,课本解释“社”为“应社”是否准确等,均无从回答。《汉语大词典》、《辞海》、《明史》等,也从未涉及“应社”的有关情况。 查《中国古典文学辞典》等材料后,笔者才明白“应社”与“复社”的有关情况:明熹宗天启时,大江南北文学社团蜂拥而起,张溥、陈贞慧等11位读书人,在苏州等地组织了文学团体“应社”,影响 Textbooks refer to “society” in the “Family of Behaviors in My Society”, in particular in the brackets, and refer to “referring to society”. Throughout the entire chapter, only in the caption, Zhang Jian and his fellow townsman Zhang Cai etc. “ ”Fushe“ didn’t see any explanation about ”Responsible Society“. This is puzzling: ”Which society“ is when the establishment of what organization, it is related to ”Resurrection Society“ is what, textbook interpretation of ”society“ is ”according to“ is accurate, etc., have no answer. ”Chinese Dictionary“, ”Ci Hai“, ”Ming Dynasty“, etc., have never been involved in the situation of ”Corporation“. After investigating the “Chinese Classical Dictionary of Literature” and other materials, the author only understood the situation concerning Yingshe and Fushe: When the Ming dynasty saw the revelation, the literary societies flocked from the north to the south, and 11 scholars such as Zhang Yi and Chen Zhenhui were in Suzhou. The organization of the literary group ”responsible to society" was organized