论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】行政诉讼法第五十四条第(四)项虽规定行政处罚显失公正的,可以判决变更,但由于显失公正属于行政处罚行为合法但存在不合理因素的问题,而不合理因素达到何种程度才算显失公正,无论是行政诉讼法还是最高人民法院的司法解释均没有给出任何指导性意见,致使司法实践中一方面行政审判法官因唯恐司法权僭越行政权而极少运用司法变更权,另一方面由于不同法官对显失公正的涵义理解不一致,致使相同的不合理情形是否需要司法变更以及判决变更的幅度也不一致,一定程度上影响了司法的权威性。
Although the provisions of Article 54 (4) of the Administrative Procedure Law are obviously unfair, they may make a decision to change. However, since the manifestly unfairness is lawful but there are unreasonable factors in administrative punishment, The extent to which the reasonable factors can be regarded as unjust, neither the Administrative Procedure Law nor the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court give any guiding opinions. As a result, on the one hand, the judicial trial judge, on the one hand, fears judicial power over the other, On the other hand, due to the inconsistent understanding by different judges of the obvious and unfair connotations, the same unreasonable circumstances require judicial changes and inconsistent judgment changes, to a certain extent, this has affected the judicial authority.