自经济法作为一个独立概念出现之日起 ,有关经济法的争论就开始了。可以说正是因为这种争论才有了经济法的发展 ,经过多年的争论、探索 ,经济法的科学内涵及准确表述正越来越清晰地凸现在人们的面前。同时 ,也必须清楚地认识到对经济法的探索仍然处于初级阶段 ,其诸多基本理论问题都需要继续争论和探索。这些争论最为根本的分歧集中在经济法的调整对象问题上。经济法的外部独立性问题 (即经济法是否具备独立的调整对象 ) ,作为经济法的调整对象须臾不可缺少的问题之一 ,在国内外众说纷纭。可以说 ,如果能够很好地解答这个问题 ,应该可以为经济法理论的长期争论有一个新的突破 ,然而这又是一个十分难以澄清的“理论死结” ,否则也不会令如此众多睿智的学者们感到困惑。文章就上述问题进行了详尽论述。 Since the emergence of Economic Law as an independent concept, the debate on economic law has begun. It can be said precisely because of this controversy, there was the development of economic law. After years of debate and exploration, the scientific connotation and accurate representation of economic law are becoming more and more obvious in front of people. At the same time, it must also be clearly recognized that the exploration of economic law is still in its infancy and many of its basic theoretical issues need to be further debated and explored. The most fundamental differences of these debates are focused on the issue of the object of economic law's adjustment. The issue of the external independence of economic law (that is, whether the economic law has an independent object of adjustment) is one of the indispensable issues that must be adjusted as the object of economic law and is widely discussed at home and abroad. It can be said that if we can answer this question well, we should be able to make a new breakthrough in the long-standing debate over the theory of economic law. However, this is another “theoretical deathknock” that is very difficult to be clarified. Otherwise, we will not make so many wise Scholars are confused. Article on the above issues were discussed in detail.