日前,美国学者拉维·阿杰拉和俄罗斯科学院教授塔奇娅娜·米特罗娃共同撰写的《俄美关系与欧亚能源市场分析报告》在华盛顿正式发布。报告一发布就引发诸多争议,多名学者就某些观点产生分歧。对此,《中国能源报》进行了归纳分析,认为—报告所提及的最有争议的三个观点包括:俄罗斯和美国公司在决定投资时首先考虑经济因素而不是政治因素;美国始终密切关注俄罗斯与欧亚国家间的能源供求动态;俄罗斯出口国地位比欧亚进口国地位更显弱势。美俄的能源关系千丝万缕。拉维在报告中指出,美国和俄罗斯虽然都是能源 Recently, the “Russia-US Relations and Eurasian Energy Market Analysis Report” co-authored by American scholar Lavi Ajera and Russian Academy of Sciences professor Taciyana Mitrova was officially released in Washington. As soon as the report was released, many controversies were triggered and many scholars disagree on certain points of view. In this regard, China Energy News summarized the analysis and concluded that the three most controversial points mentioned in the report include: Russian and U.S. companies should first consider economic rather than political factors in their investment decisions; the United States has always followed closely The dynamics of energy supply and demand between Russia and Eurasian countries; the position of Russian exporter is even more disadvantaged than that of Eurasian importer. The energy relations between the United States and Russia are inextricably linked. Ravi pointed out in the report that although both the United States and Russia are energy sources