2013年11月12日,中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第三次全体会议通过了《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》(以下简称《决定》)。其中,“推进法治中国建设”的政策要求深化司法体制改革,使司法正义惠及人民群众。《决定》把法律文书说理作为司法公开的前提性条件。毫无疑问,这项政治性要求将会增强司法文书的正当性、权威性,从而为深化司法改革再添燃料和助力。本文主要以民事判决书说理为例,探讨其说理的制度细节。 On November 12, 2013, the Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China adopted the Decision of the CPC Central Committee on Several Important Issues concerning the Overall Deepening of Reform (hereinafter referred to as the Decision). Among them, the policy of “promoting the rule of law in China’s construction” calls for deepening the reform of the judicial system so that judicial justice benefits the people. The “Decision” treats the legal instruments as the precondition for judicial disclosure. Undoubtedly, this political requirement will enhance the legitimacy and authority of judicial documents so as to add fuel and boosts for judicial reform. This article mainly takes the civil judgments theory as an example to discuss the system details of its reasoning.