为什么当我们按照唯物主义与唯心主义两大阵营的对立和斗争这样一个线索来梳理哲学史时,总是觉得有所遗漏、有所曲解,给人隔靴搔痒之感?为什么今天我们编写马克思主义哲学原理教科书时,不论我们设计怎样的框架,从实践出发也好,以存在论、认识论、价值论和历史观四个方面作为框 Why, when we sort out the history of philosophy according to such clues as the antagonism and struggle between the two camps of materialism and idealism, we always feel omissions and misinterpretations that give people a sense of what it means? Why Today? We wrote the principles of Marxist philosophy Textbooks, no matter what kind of framework we design, starting from the practice of Ye Hao, with the theory of ontology, epistemology, axiology and the concept of history as the four areas