论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析不同方法治疗妇科门诊女性尿失禁的临床效果。方法:选取2015年10月~2016年10月于我院妇科门诊就诊的106例尿失禁女性患者,以随机分配为分组原则,每组各53例。对照组患者接受盆底康复器治疗,在对照组基础上,观察组患者增加生物反馈电刺激治疗,对比临床治疗效果。结果:观察组患者的临床治疗有效率为96.23%高于对照组81.13%;在各项生活质量评分上,观察组与对照组相比差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相对于盆底康复器,生物反馈电刺激在女性尿失禁的临床治疗上具有明显的治疗优势,可提高临床治疗有效率,改善患者的生活质量。
Objective: To explore the clinical effects of different methods in the treatment of urinary incontinence in gynecological clinic. Methods: From October 2015 to October 2016, 106 female patients with urinary incontinence treated in gynecology outpatient department of our hospital were randomly assigned to the principle of grouping, with 53 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received pelvic floor rehabilitation, and on the basis of the control group, patients in the observation group were treated with biofeedback stimulation and compared with clinical treatment. Results: The effective rate of clinical treatment was 96.23% in observation group and 81.13% in control group. There was significant difference between observation group and control group in each quality of life score (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared with pelvic floor rehabilitation device, biofeedback electrical stimulation has obvious therapeutic advantages in the clinical treatment of female urinary incontinence, which can improve the efficiency of clinical treatment and improve the quality of life of patients.