论文部分内容阅读
近两年来,许多史学家、人类学家不约而同地根据恩格斯及马克思的有关著作,提出了“正在形成中的人”的新概念,学术观点主要发表在《古人类论文集》、《中国上古史纲》、《人类发展史》等书刊里。这无疑对于我国人类学、史前学的发展有很大意义。然而专家们在怎样理解马列原著和如何解释“正在形成中的人”与“劳动”的关系上却有分歧。我不揣浅陋,提出异于诸家的意见,请专家学者批评指正。《世界上古史纲》(下简称《史纲》)观点最有代表性,先将其《前言》有关部分详引如次:
In the recent two years, many historians and anthropologists have invariably proposed new concepts of “emerging people” based on the works of Engels and Marx. Academic perspectives are mainly published in Proceedings of the Ancients, History of the Middle Ages “,” History of Human Development “and other books and periodicals. This undoubtedly has great significance for the development of anthropology and prehistory in our country. However, experts disagree on how to understand the original Marxist-Leninist works and how to explain the relationship between ”people in formation“ and ”labor“. I do not speculate shallow, put forward different opinions, experts and scholars criticized. The ”history of the world’s history“ (hereinafter referred to as ”history“) the most representative point of view, first of its ”Foreword" part of the details of the order: