论文部分内容阅读
如何研究和看待西方马克思主义,我国学术界存在着不同的意见和分歧。徐崇温先生在《马克思主义研究》上相继发表《评“西方马克思主义”就是马克思主义》(2000年第5期,以下简称“一评”)、《再评“西方马克思主义”就是马克思主义》(2002年第6期,以下简称“再评”)、《三评“西方马克思主义”就是马克思主义》(2003年第3期)三篇论文,其中前两篇是批评笔者的,后一篇主要是批评段忠桥先生的,通过这些批评,徐先生还就西方马克思主义研究中的若干基本理论问题提出了自己的看法。遵守学术规范的学术争论,有利于弄清问题和学术的进步。为了使论及的问题更加集中,笔者将就双方争论中涉及研究和评论西方马克思主义的重大理论问题,进一步阐发自己的观点,也以此作为对徐崇温先生的答辩。
How to study and treat Western Marxism, there are different opinions and differences in our academic circles. In the “Study of Marxism,” Mr. Xu Chongwen published “Review Marxism in Western Marxism” (No. 5 of 2000, hereinafter referred to as “a review”), “re-evaluation of” Western Marxism “Is Marxism” (No. 6, 2002, hereinafter referred to as “re-evaluation”), “three comments” “Western Marxism” is “Marxism” (2003 the third period) three papers, of which the first two The article criticizes the author, the latter mainly criticizes Mr. Duan Zhongqiao. Through these criticisms, Mr. Xu also put forward his own views on some basic theoretical issues in the study of Western Marxism. Argument with academic norms of academic debate, help to clarify the issue and academic progress. In order to focus more on the issues discussed, I will further elaborate my own views on the major theoretical issues involved in the study and comment on Western Marxism in the debates between the two sides and also as a reply to Mr. Xu Chongwen.