论文部分内容阅读
有关郑三发子的故事,素来有两派意见争执不休。以唐人《金陵春梦》为首的认为蒋介石就是郑三发子,而浙江一带出版的文史资料则斥之为捕风捉影之谈。两派意见各执一词,早已成为民国史上一大“景观”。近来笔者从中国第二历史档案馆所藏国民政府档案全宗之杂件中,发现了郑发的两封信件,对否定唐人之说可能有所帮助。这是国民政府分别于1946年12月13日和1948年6月2日收到郑发的两封来信。第一封信是由高桂楠摘由登
About the story of Sammi Cheng, there have always been two schools of opinion dispute endlessly. The Tang Chinese “Jinling Spring Dream” headed by Chiang Kai-shek think that is the third son of hair, while the textbooks and periodicals in the vicinity of Zhejiang is discredited as catching the eye. The opinions of both schools stand for each other and they have long become a major “landscape” in the history of the Republic of China. Recently I discovered two letters from Zheng Fa from the miscellaneous records of the archives of the Kuomintang government in the Second Historical Archives of China, which may help to deny the Chinese saying. This is the two letters that the National Government received from Zheng Fa on December 13, 1946 and June 2, 1948, respectively. The first letter is picked by Gao Guinan board