选入目前全日制十年制学校通用语文课本的文章,我们都习惯地称之为“范文”。这些“范文”,不论从思想性还是从艺术性上看,都给我们提供了许多可资学习的东西。但我们也不能不看到,即使是主要倾向很好的“范文”,也并非十全十美,有些篇目,或多或少,或轻或重,也存在着漏洞或讹误之处。鉴于这种情况,讲解“范文”时,就应细推敲,说真 Articles that have been selected for the current general-purpose ten-year school general-purpose language textbook are all commonly referred to as “Pham Van.” These “paradigms” provide us with many things we can learn, both ideologically and artistically. However, we can not fail to see that there is a loophole or corruption in even the most “pro-good” “essay,” which is not very perfect and some is more or less light or heavy. In view of this situation, when explaining “Pham Van”, we should carefully scrutinize and tell the truth