论文部分内容阅读
在当前各种学科交叉的研究视野下,中国现代文学研究中一些通行的理论模式应该受到挑战。首先,遇到挑战的是中国现代文学研究中研究主体的自信与自大现象。长期以来,为数不少的研究者从不同角度反复论证了中国现代文学思潮发展的必然性、合理性、优越性和正宗地位,形成一种过分自大的研究气氛.在“客观拜物教”的理论模式之后,一个被频繁使用的词汇是“规律”。如果说就中国现代文学而言,现实主义文学的发展是必然的话,那么至少应该同时意识到,这种必然性跨出中国一步就必然荡然无存(日本近代文学可作为有力的反证)。同样,“现实主义在整个中国现代文学史上的贯彻始终和不断壮大发展是中国现代文学史的一条基本发展规律”这种极其常见的论述,除了
Under the current cross-sectional research perspective of various disciplines, some popular theoretical models in the study of Chinese modern literature should be challenged. First of all, the challenge is the self-confidence and arrogance of research subjects in the study of Chinese modern literature. For a long time, a large number of researchers have repeatedly demonstrated from different angles the inevitability, rationality, superiority and authenticity of the development of Chinese modern literary thoughts, forming an overly arrogant research atmosphere.In the theoretical model of “objective fetishism” After that, one of the most frequently used words is “law.” If the development of realist literature is an inevitable one in terms of modern Chinese literature, then at the same time it must be realized at the same time that this inevitability inevitably vanishes step by step in China (modern Japanese literature can be a powerful counter-argument). Similarly, the extremely common argument that “realism has been implemented throughout the history of modern Chinese literature and is constantly expanding is a fundamental law of development in the history of modern Chinese literature”