论文部分内容阅读
新手对专家的信任是在风险与安全博弈背景下进行的理性选择,二者差异的实质是理性之争。新手理性是以常识与经验为基础的社会理性,特征是情境化、主体性与冲突性;专家理性是以知识与技能为基础的科技理性,特征是去背景化、可计算性与单向度。专家理性凭借知识与权威进行风险规制,但技术教条主义的单边行动策略徒增规制成本与再造次生风险。规制的失灵使得专家理性转向风险治理以破除科技理性的妄断与独大,实现社会生活合理化。
Novices trust the experts in the background of risk and security in the rational choice of the game, the essence of the difference between the two is a rational dispute. Neophyte rational is based on common sense and experience of social rationality, characterized by contextualization, subjectivity and conflict; expert rationality is based on knowledge and skills of science and technology, characterized by background, computability and one-way . Expert rationality relies on knowledge and authority for risk regulation, but technical dogmatism’s unilateral action strategy simply increases regulatory costs and recreates secondary risks. The failure of regulation made the expert’s rationality turn to risk management to break the scruples and dominance of science and technology and rationalize social life.