论文部分内容阅读
谢俊美教授编校的《奕譞致翁同龢函稿》及《翁同龢集》,在整理历史文献汇编《朴园越议》时,无论时间考订、文本移录、断句标点,还是人物注释,都带有较大讹误。尤其将二十五封别人写给翁同龢的信件,张冠李戴,作为翁同龢致醇王的信函,收入《翁同龢集》,更是明显的学术硬伤,也影响了读者对史料的使用和对历史事件的判断,必须予以考订和纠正。《朴园越议》是研究1883—1885年中法战争前后清政府上层政治动向的重要史料,应当引起学术界的高度关注。
In the compilation of historical documents compilation of “Pu Yuanyue Meeting”, edited by Professor Tse Chun Mei, “Yi Yi Zhi Zhi Weng He Ji” and “Weng Tong He Ji”, regardless of time, text transcription, sentence punctuation, or character annotation, all carry Greater corruption. In particular, the letter written by 25 other people to Weng Tonghe and Zhang Guanli Dai, as a letter from Weng Tonghe to the Alcoholic Revenue and the income of Weng Tonghe, is even more obvious and flawed. It has also affected readers’ use of historical materials and their use of historical materials Judgment, we must test and correct. “Park Yuanyue Meeting” is an important historical material for studying the upper-class political trends of the Qing government before and after the Sino-French War 1883-1885 and should attract the great attention of the academic circles.