有一句俗语说“惊讶的言论有要惊讶的证明.”这一通常的思想在对UFO证据的解释时产生这样的课题:一份惊讶的证明报告本身就是一篇惊讶的古论,反过来,这一惊讶的古论,又要有更多惊讶的证明.这一具有讽刺意味的结果是:经过仔细证明的案例却反而没有那些没什么证明的案例更让人相信.例如,有人说见过不像是人造的飞行物.这是一个惊讶的言论,但若他用一张这个飞行物的照片作为证明,而这张照片又是一个惊讶的结果.我们总能假定照片是伪造的. There is a saying that “surprising remarks have to be astonished proof.” This usual thought in the interpretation of UFO evidence such problems arise: a surprised proof that the report itself is a surprising ancient theory, in turn, There is more astonishment in this astonishing proof, and the ironic result is that it is even more convincing to find that there are no proven cases in the case of careful proof, for example, It was astonishing remarks, but if he used a photograph of this flying object as a proof, the photograph was a surprise, and we could always assume that the photograph was forged.