论文部分内容阅读
Three types of relations are entangled nowadays in dealing with issues conceming national cultural security on both the theoretical and practical levels:(1) the relation between one’s own culture and that of other ethnic groups;(2) the relation between advanced and underdeveloped parts of culture;(3) the relation between one’s ethnic culture and so-called foreign advanced culture as related to the previous two.Accordingly,three modes of thinking are likely adopted in handling issues concing national cultural security:to antagonize one’s own culture with that of other ethnic groups,that is,taking the me or you attitude;to dualize cultures as the advanced and the underdeveloped,that is,believing things to be good if not bad,or vice versa;and to assert that the ethnic are the advanced,that is,taking the only-megood stance.It is a very demanding job to maintain national culture and to pursue cultural development at the same time.Only when cultures are grouped into those without distinction between the advanced and the underdeveloped and those with such distinction can the relation between the ethnic and the advanced be properly handled.With the former,it is essential to maintain the ethnicity of one’s own culture before the cultural security is safeguarded.With the latter,however,the pursuit of advanced cultures and the advocacy of the advanced part of a particular culture is a key to ensuring and safeguarding the national cultural security.Hence,it is important to enhance the public awareness of cultural security,and more essentially for the govment to offer scientifically appropriate orientation towards cultural security and to frame related policies.