论文部分内容阅读
契诃夫《樱桃园》中特罗菲墨夫的形象一直存在较大争议,赞成者认为他是思想的先觉者,否定者认为他也是契诃夫抨击的对象。客观来看,契诃夫借特罗菲墨夫之口道出了许多严肃的命题,对其有肯定意味,但对其“尚空谈不切实际”的行为也做了相当尖刻的嘲讽。契诃夫借特罗菲墨夫这一知识分子形象的塑造,既批判徒尚空谈的软弱,又始终没有放弃对人的期望与对未来的幻想。
Chekhov “Cherry Orchard” in Tofi Moofu image has always been more controversial, in favor of those who think he is ideological concubine, who think he is also Chekhov criticized the object. Objectively speaking, Chekhov with Trofimik portrayed many serious propositions, which have a certain affirmation, but for its “talkative impractical ” behavior also made a rather sarcastic irony . Chekhov’s creation of the image of intellectuals like Troymertu not only criticized the weakness of the empty talk but never gave up the expectations of people and the illusions of the future.