论文部分内容阅读
本刊1980№2发表了张有松同志的“t_1+t_2=πL~(1/2)C?”一文和我们商榷,特简答如下: (1)“商榷”文中的意见与我们(见本刊1979№3)的区别主要在于第二个换流脉冲的起始点是否限在ωt=π处。我们选在π处只是因为这个点“位置比较明确,不随负载变动,脉冲易于控制。”此外别无他意。有松同志论述了脉冲位置任意时的情况,其结论与我们的结论吻合。这个说明是很好的,它使问题更为全面,我们表示欢迎与感谢。至于Q=∞的条
This article published in 1980 № 2 Comrade Zhang Yousong, “t_1 + t_2 = πL ~ (1/2) C?” And let us discuss the special short answer is as follows: (1) “deliberation” the views of the text and we (see this Publication 1979 № 3) The main difference is that the starting point of the second commutation pulse is limited to ωt = π at. We chose π at this point only because “the position is clear and does not vary with load, and the pulse is easy to control.” There Comrade Song discussed the location of the pulse at any time, the conclusion is consistent with our conclusion. This statement is very good, it makes the problem more comprehensive, and we welcome and thank you. As for the Q = ∞ bar