论文部分内容阅读
裁判文书上网是一种最便捷、经济、有效的司法公开方式。个人信息应受法律保护已是共识,作为私益冲突的民事纠纷,通过诉讼解决形成的民事裁判文书中包含了大量的个人信息。在上述立法规定之前最高法院已制定多项文书上网的具体规定,但各地“各行其是”的裁判文书上网实践中,将包含其中的个人信息一同公开的现象仍普遍存在,引起纠纷的同时也使公众产生了对文书公开本身的质疑。对个人信息的保护与民事诉讼的公开审理与公开宣判两大原则并不冲突,保护是为了更好地进行司法公开。通过事先将个人信息分成“绝对公开”“绝对不公开”“可以公开”三类,并对“绝对不公开”的个人信息作出“直接删除”或“匿名化处理”的规定之后,利用计算机软件技术对散见于裁判文书的个人信息进行智能识别、处理系高效、便捷的途径,然后再进行人工核对,以期达到全面保护的目的。
Referee documents online is one of the most convenient, economical and effective way of judicial openness. It is a consensus that personal information should be protected by law. As a civil dispute involving conflicts of interest, a large amount of personal information is contained in civil judgment documents formed through litigation. Before the above-mentioned legislative provisions, the Supreme Court has formulated the specific provisions of a number of documents on the Internet, but in all parts of the world, “all acts of the accused” in the online practice, including personal information which are still common with the public, causing disputes Make the public have questioned the openness of the document itself. The protection of personal information does not conflict with the two major principles of public trial and public pronouncement in civil litigation, and the protection is for better judicial disclosure. By prior personal information is divided into “absolutely open ” “is not open ” “can be open ” three categories, and “absolutely not open ” personal information to make “direct delete ” or Anonymization treatment ", the use of computer software technology scattered in the arbitration documents of personal information intelligent identification, processing Department of efficient and convenient way, and then manually check in order to achieve the purpose of comprehensive protection.