论文部分内容阅读
把项目联盟看做是合作博弈的均衡结果,把决策者处理信息的能力以及寻找合作伙伴的方式作为决定治理结构的重要影响因素。引入重置成本的概念,将参与人的谈判能力内生化,并在建设项目3C结构的基础上构建联盟博弈模型。分析结果表明,重置成本越大,项目联盟越稳定;当不确定性的影响微不足道,进而使重置成本降低到一定程度时,联盟博弈的核成为空集,项目这种组织形式也就失去了存在的意义。在研究建设项目的稳定性时,需要充分考虑解析方法与公平观的一致性。在多数情况下,凭直觉制订的收益分配方案往往与联盟博弈中的公平观不相符。
Think of the project coalition as the equilibrium result of the cooperative game. The ability of the decision makers to process information and the way to find the partners are the important factors that determine the governance structure. The concept of replacement cost is introduced to endow the participants with bargaining power and build a coalition game model based on the 3C structure of construction projects. The results show that the larger the replacement costs, the more stable the project alliance. When the impact of uncertainty is negligible and the replacement cost is reduced to a certain extent, the nucleus of the coalition game becomes an empty set. The meaning of existence. In studying the stability of construction projects, we need to fully consider the consistency of analytical methods and fairness. In most cases, the reward distribution scheme instinctively tends to be inconsistent with the fair view in the coalition game.