论文部分内容阅读
拉萨尔,何许人也,马克思早有定论。拉萨尔主张在社会主义社会里劳动者应该“不折不扣”地领回全部社会产品。马克思在《哥达纲领批判》中批判了拉萨尔的这一谬论,阐述了在社会主义制度下,社会总产品在用作劳动者劳动报酬分配给个人之前必须扣除: 一、用来补偿消耗掉的生产资料的部分; 二、用来扩大生产的追加部分; 三、用来应付不幸事故、自然灾害等的后备基金或保险金; 四、和生产没有关系的一般管理费用; 五、用来满足社会共同需要的部分,如学校、保健设施等; 六、为丧失劳动能力的人等等设立的基金。
Lassalle, whomever also, Marx has long been a conclusion. LaSalle argues that laborers in socialistic society should be able to claim all social products “without any compromise”. In the Critique of the Gotha Program, Marx criticized this fallacy of Lassalle and expounded that under the socialist system, the total social product must be deducted before it can be used to distribute the remuneration of laborers to individuals: First, compensation for consumption Of the means of production; 2, used to expand the additional part of production; 3, used to deal with unfortunate accidents, natural disasters, reserve funds or insurance; Fourth, and production has nothing to do with the general management costs; The common needs of society, such as schools, health facilities, etc .; six, for the loss of ability to work and so set up the fund.