论文部分内容阅读
近年来,中国民俗学领域对于本真性的探讨越来越开放。民间历史编撰作品将本真性所具有的多义性充分体现出来,用海登·怀特的概念化层面即论证、情节化和意识形态蕴涵层面分析其中的经典,能够看到决定不同作品地位及受众认可的因素是什么,而判断标准并不如人们想象中客观。研究者的考察和评价,理应置于更为多元的人类文化现象、更为悠久的文学史和更为深厚的本土传统之中。
In recent years, the field of Chinese folklore has become more and more open to authenticity. The works of folk history compose the polysemy fully reflected in the authenticity, and analyze the classic in Hayden Wright’s conceptualization level, argumentativeness, plot-orientation and ideological implication, and can see that the decision of the different works and audience recognition What is the factor, and the judgment standard is not as objective as people imagine. The investigation and evaluation of researchers should be placed in a more diverse human cultural phenomenon, a longer history of literature and a more profound indigenous tradition.