著名文学总集《文选》对建安七子作品之去取,颇具讨论价值。不录徐斡,是因为其作品不符合《文选》的思想标准,同时也不具有典范意义。《文选》对建安赋总体上排斥,故于建安七子中只选录王粲《登楼赋》一篇。《文选》选录王粲、刘桢、应砀的诗以及孔融、陈琳、阮瑀的文,固然是既定标准所致,也有主观认识的局限。而且,去取方面这种贴标签的做法,影响后人对建安七子的文学价值判断。 Well-known collection of literary “anthologies” Jian’an seven works to go, quite a discussion value. The reason why he did not record Xu’s works is because his works do not meet the ideological standards of “anthologies,” nor do they have exemplary meanings. “Wenxuan” generally rejects the construction of ancientry, so only Wang Jian’s “ascension to the floor” is selected from among the seven Jian-An. The selection of Wang Wen, Liu Zhen and Ying Ying’s poem by Wen Xuan and the articles by Kong Rong, Chen Lin and Nguyen Nguyen are both due to established standards and subjective understanding. Moreover, to take aspects of this labeling practices, affecting future generations Jian’an seven literary value judgments.