孔子主张依靠德政治国,“以政为德,譬如北辰,居其所而众星拱之。”(论语《为政》)明确地反对暴政与压迫。而孟子则走得更远一些,阐述得也更细致更具体。“五亩之宅,树之以桑,五十者可以衣帛矣。鸡豚狗彘之畜,无失其时,七十者可以食肉矣。百亩之田,勿夺其时,数口之家可以无饥矣。谨庠序之教,中之以孝悌之义,颁白者不负戴于道路矣。七十衣帛食肉, Confucius advocated relying on political governance in Germany and ”taking politics as virtue, such as Beichen, in whose name it stands.“ (The Analects of Confucius ”Governing“) explicitly opposed tyranny and oppression. Mencius went a little farther, explaining more concretely and more specifically. ”Five mu of house, the tree of mulberry, fifty can be carried on the clothes .Great chickadee puppies of the livestock, without loss of the time, seventy people can be meat carry on. The mouth of the house can be hungry .Classical teachings, in the meaning of filial piety, who presented the white people wear the road carry on .Seventy clothing silk meat,