论文部分内容阅读
把“经济基础和上层建筑问题的讨论”、“思维与存在的同一性问题的讨论”和“一分为二与合二而一的论战”说成是建国以来“哲学上的三次大论战”是康生为恶意批判杨献珍而提出的,有特定的含义。“哲学上的三次大论战”的说法,既不符合上世纪我国五六十年代哲学战线上争论的实际,也不利于实事求是地总结哲学发展的历史经验。“哲学上的三次大论战”的提法不宜继续使用。
To “discuss the discussion of the economic foundation and the superstructure”, “the discussion of the question of the sameness of thinking and existence” and “the debate of dividing the two into one and the other one” should be said to be “since the founding of the People’s Republic” The three great philosophical controversies “were proposed by Kang Sheng for malicious criticism of Yang Xianzhen and have a specific meaning. ”Philosophical Three Great Controversies, “ argument, neither in line with the last century the fifties and sixties of the philosophical debate on the actual, is not conducive to seek truth from facts and historical development of philosophy. ”Three major philosophical controversy " formulation should not continue to use.