自从2000年6月AMD发布Duron(钻龙)以来,在短短的半年之间,已经获取了许多低端PC市场份额,成功地取代了K6系列的位置。它拥有赛扬Ⅱ般的超频能力,又拥有K6般的低价格,成为目前零售市场上性能/价格比最高的CPU之一。不过,在原装机市场中,许多厂商都没有把Duron列入产品计划中,甚至连Athlon也无法取得赛扬和奔腾Ⅲ相同的地位,为何会这样?经过一番分析,我们发现Socket A阵营只有独立型芯片组,没有如i810E、i815E般的整合型芯片组,这对原装机方面的推广极为不列,你根本不可能要求OEM制造商在整批机器中安装KT133+GeForce 2MX的配置,毕竟零售市场和原装机市场面向的对象有一定的差异,他们认为第三方提供的显示芯片会增加成本和测试的负担,只有包括显卡、声卡、Modem的一揽子解决方案才最符合生产要求,厂商们只须通过 Since the release of Duron in June 2000, AMD has acquired many low-end PC market shares in just six months, successfully replacing the K6 series. It has Celeron Ⅱ-like overclocking capabilities, but also has a K6-like low price, becoming the current retail market performance / price ratio of one of the CPU. However, in the original machine market, many manufacturers did not include Duron in the product plan, and even Athlon can not get the Celeron and Pentium III in the same position, why? After some analysis, we found that Socket A camp only independent Chipset, there is no integrated chipset like the i810E, i815E, which is very not the promotion of the original machine, you simply can not require the OEM manufacturer to install KT133 + GeForce 2MX configuration in the entire batch of machines, after all, retail There is a certain difference between the market and the original machine market-oriented objects. They think the display chips provided by third parties will increase the cost and burden of testing. Only the solution package including graphics, sound card and modem can best meet the production requirements. Manufacturers only need by